|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hello i am sorry if this is a stupid question but how can i make the checksum without the folder path. i am trying to implement this into a installer/setup but i don't want to have to edit the checksum file each time to remove the file path.
the file named "checksums-original.txt" is what i get if i do it normally copy the folder path and press ctl+v in the software. and the file named "checksums-fixed.txt" is what i need, i already tested it and it works. but if you can help me with this that would be great, also im kinda new so im sorry if this is kinda weird or does not make sense. PS. Awesome program works really well
Last edited by Razer-785; 23-03-2026 at 13:09. |
| Sponsored Links |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to L33THAK0R For This Useful Post: | ||
Razer-785 (27-12-2025) | ||
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Substantial update was pushed to the repo last night, changelog is as follows:
v2.50 Changelog New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
Known Issues
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the tool, but could you also upload "static" build w/o need to install Dotnet for endusers?
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unfortunately not, I'm only somewhat alright with high-level languages, I have no experience with low-level languages like C++ & Rust. My current solution searches for the .NET 10 installation at the default path (Assuming C: is the system drive), if not found my installer enables the .NET 10 redist download option (under my redist menu), and installs post-install. It's not perfect but it's the only viable solution I've got currently. C# is an easy language to learn but is mainly designed to work with the .NET runtime/libraries. Maybe down the road I'll look into porting the codebase to something independent, but the costs far outweigh the benefits. Even if using SharpSFV without .NET 10 being installed, there is enough logic embedded in the application to direct the end-user to the appropriate download page.
|
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
^^
FitGirl means for the .NET runtime to be built into the compiled executable, please see below: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...c-sharp-wpf-pr However in my experience, this leads the compiled file to be 30-40mb in size. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to L33THAK0R For This Useful Post: | ||
Razer-785 (26-02-2026) | ||
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
v2.52 Release
A couple smaller QoL updates, can't think of any additional front-end improvements, or significant back-end optimisations. If anyone has any suggestions or bugs to report, I'll keep an eye on the GitHub issues.
v2.52 Changelog New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to L33THAK0R For This Useful Post: | ||
Razer-785 (26-02-2026) | ||
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Merged another project I'd been working on, essentially a stripped down version of SharpSFV that focused on shell integration, mimicking kliu.org's HashCheck utility, but with xxhash3 support. Made a few improvements to the front-end I'd overlooked, as well as a bit of tidying up the back-end, made everything a lot more stable, more streamlined. Quite happy with how it's turning out, outside of course the increased binary size.
v2.6 Changelog New Features
User Interface & Experience
Fixes & Maintenance
Last edited by L33THAK0R; 17-01-2026 at 21:50. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Added a very minor v2.61 update, not even really worth patchnotes for, just fixed some edge cases where the legacy SFV support was breaking down. Main purpose of this push was re-writing documentation across every significant class, because Lord knows I'm going to forget how some of this spaghetti code works in the future.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to L33THAK0R For This Useful Post: | ||
Razer-785 (26-02-2026) | ||
![]() |
|
|