why corepack is faster and fitgirl is smaller

[78372]

I just don't use srep 3.9 series, has bugs in Win 10.

For bigger games, I use 3.2

For small games, I use 2.94 to force stop virtual memory creation

[elit]

Originally Posted by 78372

I just don't use srep 3.9 series, has bugs in Win 10.

I don't want to promise anything, especially since it may happen in very long time from now(if ever, games first ), but... I am already laying out a functional block scheme for my own new "srep", build from scratch.

Btw, latest srep is perfectly fine if you don't use <stdin> during compression, either that or avoid m3-5[f] altogether and use only default m3-5 just to be sure. Or, don't touch computer(i.e. background tasks) during compression(yes only compression event matter for whether you get crc fail or not when decompress).
EDIT: You mentioned Win10. I am not sure if there is another problem vs Win7, but I guess it may be same only more exaggerated.