Shelwien's Reflate compatible with Freearc

[felice2011]

How To Benchmark I took the ReflateMT version with a 122MB input.

-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.0.6c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 15/10/2016 09:51:24
=============================================================================================================================================
 ○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○

   Arc+reflateMT         122,1°MB          240,4°MB      196,89 %              1°Files    00:00:59:925   a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mreflate 
=============================================================================================================================================

Here I've tested both versions "l & k" with CLS support ...

-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.0.6c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 15/10/2016 11:24:31
=============================================================================================================================================
 ○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○

 Arc+Refl1_K_CLS         122,1°MB          237,5°MB      194,51 %              1°Files    00:01:16:877   a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mreflate 
=============================================================================================================================================

-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.0.6c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 15/10/2016 11:29:48
=============================================================================================================================================
 ○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○

 Arc+Refl1_L_CLS         122,1°MB          237,5°MB      194,51 %              1°Files    00:01:16:876   a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mreflate 
=============================================================================================================================================

Between the two versions reflate with CLS "l & k" to understand, there is no substantial difference, a difference between the reflate CLS version and the version ReflateMT, in favor of the latter in terms of speed, and with a higher threshold of reflate.
The reflate version CLS will be continuously updated, hopefully soon in new improvements.

[Razor12911]

Originally Posted by felice2011

How To Benchmark I took the ReflateMT version with a 122MB input.

-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.0.6c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 15/10/2016 09:51:24
=============================================================================================================================================
 ○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○

   Arc+reflateMT         122,1°MB          240,4°MB      196,89 %              1°Files    00:00:59:925   a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mreflate 
=============================================================================================================================================

Here I've tested both versions "l & k" with CLS support ...

-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.0.6c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 15/10/2016 11:24:31
=============================================================================================================================================
 ○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○

 Arc+Refl1_K_CLS         122,1°MB          237,5°MB      194,51 %              1°Files    00:01:16:877   a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mreflate 
=============================================================================================================================================

-↓- [ CMD Bench.Test.Info v0.0.6c ] -↓- Compressed Archive Completed At -↓- 15/10/2016 11:29:48
=============================================================================================================================================
 ○ [ ALGORITHM ] ○ [ INPUT SIZE ] ○ [ OUTPUT SIZE ] ○ [ RATIO.% ] ○ [ ARCHIVED FILES ] ○ [ COMP.TIME ] ○ [ SYNTAX - OPTIONS - ARGUMENTS ] ○

 Arc+Refl1_L_CLS         122,1°MB          237,5°MB      194,51 %              1°Files    00:01:16:876   a -ma9 -ds -lc1024 -ld1024 -ep1 -di -i2 -ed -r -s; -w"temp" -mreflate 
=============================================================================================================================================

Between the two versions reflate with CLS "l & k" to understand, there is no substantial difference, a difference between the reflate CLS version and the version ReflateMT, in favor of the latter in terms of speed, and with a higher threshold of reflate.
The reflate version CLS will be continuously updated, hopefully soon in new improvements.

You're on fire with benchmarks, wanna bench something?