another desperate and patethic CH fail

[PWizFromCH]

Why not? We do, because we are not sending ANY personal information during our authentication process.

BTW Joe, we spent DAYS compiling such info into a PDF document a couple of years ago showing how h4x0r ripped several of our trainers. We all know how that went. Not going to waste time going through that again. Believe me or not, doesn't really matter. I think the public is smart enough to figure out that online only DRM, super encrypted, which requires an account to be created at a third party website, all for a FREE PRODUCT, is more than a little phishy.

[cocodrilo]

Why not?

If the user has access to the data anyone can send false validation data. is unusual store validation data in plain text in any service.

It is easy to understand for these reasons:

The key is generated in the server, and downloaded in your profile in SC.

The file not change or increase in the user computer.

is the file is generated in the server ¿how to send other information? please explain.

Its good to know:

The regulation implementing the Organic Law on Data Protection indicates that passwords, while in active state, will be stored in an "unintelligible" format.

[Joe Forster/STA]

Originally Posted by PWizFromCH

we spent DAYS compiling such info into a PDF document a couple of years ago showing how h4x0r ripped several of our trainers. We all know how that went.

And I spent HOURS trying to explain to you that a document by itself is not a proof, unless others can use it to make their investigations. As you haven't provided us with download links to real CheatHappens and h4x0r trainers, which I asked you several times, there was no way to make our own investigation. Neither could anyone else, including people who can reverse-engineer trainers. (Of course, I wrote down this, too, in one of our announcements.)

Originally Posted by PWizFromCH

Not going to waste time going through that again.

Me neither. You either show proof or fuck off.

Originally Posted by PWizFromCH

Believe me or not, doesn't really matter.

If it didn't really matter, you wouldn't be here complaining, would you?

Originally Posted by PWizFromCH

I think the public is smart enough to figure out that online only DRM, super encrypted, which requires an account to be created at a third party website, all for a FREE PRODUCT, is more than a little phishy.

I think the public is smart enough to recognize the false logic - and lack of actual proofs - in your posts. Not too difficult, though, as you're using quite a lot of them:
- argumentum ad hominem
- argumentum ad baculum
- argumentum ad ignorantiam
- argumentum ad verecundian
- argumentum ad ridiculum
- argumentum ad nauseam
- argumentum ex silentio
- onus probandi
- red herring
- no true Scotsman
- cherry picking
- straw man
- to quoque
(Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies, too.)

I got bored of you. Go away!