Go Back   FileForums > Game Backup > PC Games > PC Games - CD/DVD Conversions > Conversion Tutorials
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old Today, 03:58
kj911 kj911 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: world
Posts: 248
Thanks: 164
Thanked 94 Times in 67 Posts
kj911 is on a distinguished road
v1.2: Don't like CMD window forced closing, after execute "balrogg.exe" printing helps or (de)compress.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #17  
Old Today, 04:39
FitGirl FitGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Riga
Posts: 213
Thanks: 21
Thanked 249 Times in 136 Posts
FitGirl is on a distinguished road
Thanks for a new tool. I've tested it a little. My Opus tests, while showing some result don't make it usable in real repacking - the gain is tiny, no solid mode support (yet?).

Test corpus: Wwise Opus converted to generic opus: 14440 files
Opus: 581718877 bytes
Ballroggs: 567165459 bytes

Since opus files don't have codebooks which could be stored once in a solid mode and where oggre does it's job good, with opus it won't work. And rn since ballrogg doesn't support solid mode, one can't expect big gain on a smaller files concatenated into one stream.

I also tested initial ballrogg v1.0 on vorbis files in single/solid mode. It compressed files fine in single mode, but with the same files concatenated it gave an error.

Will do more tests with fresh builds when I have time.
Unfortunately for repackers, Opus is already a very effective format, with it's range-coder near Shannon limit and space for improvement is really tiny.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FitGirl For This Useful Post:
DomoVoi_96 (Today), shazzla (Today)
  #18  
Old Today, 11:46
kj911 kj911 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: world
Posts: 248
Thanks: 164
Thanked 94 Times in 67 Posts
kj911 is on a distinguished road
FitGirl: Wow! Those OPUS files are so compact! 2.5% size reduction is really not much.
For you, what would be the "sweet pot", in Kaktor's words, where you would use it, for a Repack? 5% or 10% or more?

Doesn't SREP or "lzp:8mb:3:h22:d64mb" give minimal results either? (min. 1-2KB.)

_contextmodel: Do you have a rough idea of ​​what the realistic gain would be if there were a public recompressor for WMV/WMA or MPEG-1/2 videos? (For MPEG2, there is a packer called "oca_mpeg06", but it is too slow.) Can the 2-5-10 or upto MB/s speed be achieved for these cases, as with BinkPack? You don't include H264 in the target list?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Today, 11:51
FitGirl FitGirl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Riga
Posts: 213
Thanks: 21
Thanked 249 Times in 136 Posts
FitGirl is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kj911 View Post
FitGirl: Wow! Those OPUS files are so compact! 2.5% size reduction is really not much.
For you, what would be the "sweet pot", in Kaktor's words, where you would use it, for a Repack? 5% or 10% or more?
Around 10% with a reasonable MT-speed would be nice. But I doubt it's achievable with Opus. It's REALLY very good lossy format.

As for using it instead of oggre in repacks, will wait until the format matures and gets a stable version. Since the developer is interested in that project, it looks like just a matter of time.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to FitGirl For This Useful Post:
kj911 (Today)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AFR (Anvil Forge Recompressor) oltjon Conversion Tutorials 39 08-05-2023 04:45
ZREC - Yet another zlib recompressor 78372 Software 0 24-08-2020 09:44



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 15:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
FileForums @ https://fileforums.com