View Single Post
  #1  
Old 31-08-2026, 11:30
KaktoR's Avatar
KaktoR KaktoR is offline
Lame User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: From outer space
Posts: 4,728
Thanks: 1,111
Thanked 7,393 Times in 2,863 Posts
KaktoR is on a distinguished road
The same tests as above but on ramdisk. I don't have to say these speeds are not feasible in normal use-case.

Code:
m1
Compressed 2,070 files, 2,021,911,962 => 1,398,407,774 bytes. Ratio 69.16%
Compression time: cpu 1.41 sec/real 14.24 sec = 10%. Speed 141.95 mB/s
All OK

Extracted 2,070 files, 1,398,407,774 => 2,021,911,962 bytes. Ratio 69.16%
Extraction time: cpu 2.94 sec/real 3.17 sec = 93%. Speed 637.81 mB/s
All OK


m2
Compressed 2,070 files, 2,021,911,962 => 1,381,203,454 bytes. Ratio 68.31%
Compression time: cpu 1.75 sec/real 25.10 sec = 7%. Speed 80.54 mB/s
All OK

Extracted 2,070 files, 1,381,203,454 => 2,021,911,962 bytes. Ratio 68.31%
Extraction time: cpu 2.84 sec/real 3.11 sec = 91%. Speed 649.31 mB/s
All OK


m3
Compressed 2,070 files, 2,021,911,962 => 1,369,788,214 bytes. Ratio 67.75%
Compression time: cpu 1.66 sec/real 29.67 sec = 6%. Speed 68.14 mB/s
All OK

Extracted 2,070 files, 1,369,788,214 => 2,021,911,962 bytes. Ratio 67.75%
Extraction time: cpu 3.05 sec/real 3.28 sec = 93%. Speed 615.61 mB/s
All OK
__________________
Haters gonna hate
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KaktoR For This Useful Post:
Dunnowho69 (31-08-2026), panker1992 (31-08-2026), shazzla (31-08-2026)
Sponsored Links