CLS-Nanozip: Preview
 

Hi guys, you might have noticed I have been creating a lot of CLS plugins for Freearc, it seems like for any compressor that I have in mind, well I have been trying on nanozip the only problem is the overall result hasn't been that effective, either the final size is affected badly or progress via Inno Setup or CMD window takes long to reflect dude to the fact that nanozip gives back false data when I try to steal(take) data from it while it is processing then end up with CRC error.

I gave it one last chance today then Panker told me something tragic, the creator is no longer with us which is why it isn't getting further updates however we decided that we must not give up on trying to make cls even if it doesn't work the way it is supposed to. Which is why I came up with the idea to try and give the message through to the user about the progress of the installation/unpacking process. :( (Not really sad because of no more updates, which is what most repackers would be sad of)

What I did was since it takes long to make reflections of the progress of nanozip was to make a cls that displays a GUI that shows the progress because at least I was able to figure out its progress.

So far progress is: 90%, the 10% is because after Inno Setup has used the CLS it crashes but anyways, I uploaded a few screenshots to show you guys how it looks like.

CLS-Nanozip What will it be ready?

So what method it'll have when it is done,How effective it'll be than other zips?

a very good idea, but I am concerned about the issue can somehow speed up the unpacking? currently unpacking without cls operates at a speed of 1-2 mb seconds

Excelent idea! You are becoming the master of cls.

CLS uploaded

It's just a test people, it fails sometimes at the end, have to research on how to make it stop showing that error at the end.

Check here
http://nanozip.net/

Speed is the same, all I did is try to add GUI to show progress.

and how can it accelerate?

What do you mean, how to accelerate it? What algorithm does Nanozip use?

I used the example of masked data compressed. in this example, the decompression speed is about 1-2 MB sec when using 8 cores,which is very slow when using large data

Yeah but still, what algorithm does nanozip use? How is that algorithm in terms speed?

packcmd = nz a -r -v -cc -m8g -br512m -bw512m -p4 -t0 -nm $$arcpackedfile$$.tmp.nz $$arcdatafile$$.tmp

i'm using -cO it's more faster than -cc but a small bad ratio

This is how it work's for compress:
For work's decompress:

CRC Checksum failed
 

Alpha version uploaded

Take note:
This may be buggy.
Plus if you want to change skin of this, you just gotta apply codejock styles.

Thanks Razor! 100 working! :D

Hi and thank you Razor12911 for this ! Is possible to get something like this for zpaq/zpaq64 ?

Thanks Razor! 100 working!
but compression and too low 422MB = 415MB !!!!

How to Nanozip Multi tasking?

me to :D
How to Nanozip Multi tasking?

use original nanozip from the command line and set the compression options in arc.ini.

The example given by razor on the first page has the function of compression and decompression through DLL, without setting mode through INI files, if you want to change the compression options, use nanozip in normal mode with FreeArc support, and add the external compressor settings in the "arc.ini" configuration file, logically without DLL, with native compressor nz or nz64.

;)

nanozip is very complex for a programmer in grass

@swyambhu ... You have modified and adapted the script you use for decompression Arc+nz?

In ISS ... posted by razor on the first page :

&
In Include Folder....

https://i.imgsafe.org/e89f6b73fd.png

Extracting successfully Tested....;)

using the NZ 32-bit version, with these settings, you should have:

Compres... in WinDos
Decompress.....in WinDos
-m1g = 1024
-m2g = 2048
-m3g = 3072
ETCCCC

-br256m (read Bufferrrr)
-bw256m (write Bufferr)

Change..in 64...128...256...512...etc,.....

..........:rolleyes:

I'm sorry boy, Rinaldo is right saying that nanozip is complex for its settings, but you lack the basic to begin with.
tell me how you want configure it based to your installed RAM and the number core of CPU, I create an archive, and I will send you..

non hai capito un corno.. è difficile da elaborare per farne una cls. io seguo la guida, ma è difficile per chi cerca di modificarne l'eseguibile
God forbid that I needed help for this nonsense, the question was another

penso che non c'entri nulla, dalle foto postate del ragazzo e da quello che dice il problema è solo nell'impostare l'uso della memoria ed il buffer di scrittura e lettura...segui la guida...guida...quale guida segui...
The current problem is of a different nature ...:confused:

use HEX and change
http://i91.fastpic.ru/big/2017/0223/...98f79c9d48.png

felice lascia stare tanto non ci arrivi. in generale parlo... cosa centra il ragazzo fammi capire.
What is this thing ... you want to resurrect a zombie mini?

appunto, cosa centra nel contesto e con il problema delle impostazioni nel uso normale del nanozip, volevi dire che modificare l'exe e creare le dll con una configurazione *.ini per le impostazioni è cosa difficile, così come è stato fatto per zcm..vabene ok..ma nel contesto interessa poco o a nessuno..specialmente a me che non uso sto nanozip con dll, per lo stesso motivo che sto qui a perdere tempo ed aiutare sto @swyambhu..che non si è capito se ha risolto o meno il problema..
@swyambhu..You are able to resolve, or we are still on the high seas.:)

I have not tried if it works, but it can also be a variant or solution with the editor.;)

you are the one bro, good job. Lots of new softwares to test now

I don't know much about nanozip.May I ask how effective nanozip compression is?

It's a great compressor, unfortunately was abandoned and no longer updated.

Not abandoned, the author passed away, which is sad.

It has a lot of potential, and it can make good use of compute power.

Hi Razor12911
Please CLS-Nanozip Source

I think the CLS can be used to build RAZOR

Sorry, no longer have my sources :(

if you have to spend time to make a CLS better do a cls for mcm.exe
LINK

it's really powerful and fast enough and certain repackers that we know use it

It's CM so fast is a bit wrong. More than that, it scans input data firstly, processes text, media, etc bunched together and then does the same while extracting, which is not possible with cls or stdio, you can't just write a file in output and then recall it to add components in it, It'll give CRC error